Influencia de las metas en el aprendizaje co-regulado con ambientes hipermedia

Autores/as

  • Myriam C. Leguizamón González Profesora de la Universidad Pedagógica y Tecnológica de Colombia.
  • Omar López Vargas Proifesor Universidad Pedagógica Nacional

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17227/01212494.32pys99.110

Palabras clave:

Metas de aprendizaje, ambiente hipermedia, co-regulación, logro académico, operadores tecnológicos.

Resumen

La investigación examina la relación existente entre el logro académico obtenido en la interacción con un ambiente hipermedia sobre operadores tecnológicos y la formulación de metas de aprendizaje auto-impuestas y metas de aprendizaje asignadas, en estudiantes de secundaria. El software fue especialmente diseñado para el estudio cuyo diseño se basó en un modelo cuasi-experimental.

Descargas

Los datos de descargas todavía no están disponibles.

Citas

Azevedo, R. (2005), “Using hypermedia as a metacognitive

tool for enhancing student learning? The role of

self-regulated learning”, en Educational Psychologist,

(4), pp. 199–209.

Azevedo, R. y Cromley, J. G. (2004), “Does training on selfregulated

learning facilitate students’ learning with

hypermedia?”, en Journal of Educational Psychology,

(3), pp. 523–535.

Azevedo, R. y Jacobson, M. (2008), Advances in scaffolding

learning with hypertext and hypermedia: A summary

and critical analysis. Educational Technology

Research and Development, 56(1), 93–100.

Azevedo, R.; Guthrie, J. T. y Seibert, D. (2004), “The role

of self-regulated learning in fostering students’

conceptual understanding of complex systems with

hypermedia”, en Journal of Educational Computing

Research, 30(1), pp. 87–111.

Azevedo, R. et al., (2008), “Why is externally-regulated

learning more effective than self-regulated learning

with hypermedia?”, en Educational Technology Research

and Development, 56(1), pp. 45–72.

Bandura, A. (1986), Social foundations of thought and

action. A social cognitive theory, NJ, Prentice-Hall.

Bandura, A. (1997), Self-efficacy. The exercise of control,

NY, Freeman/Times Books/ Henry Holt y Co.

Bruffee, K. A. (1993), Collaborative Learning, Higher Education,

Interdependence, and the Authority of Knowledge,

Baltimore, The Johns Hopkins University Press.

Brush, T. y Saye, J. (2001), “The use of embedded scaffolds

with hypermedia-supported student-centered

learning”, en Journal of Educational Multimedia and

Hypermedia, 10(4), pp. 333-356.

Dillenbourg, P. et al. (1996), “The evolution of research

on collaborative learning”, en H. Spada, y P. Reiman

(edits.), Learning in humans and machine. Towards

an interdisciplinary learning science, Oxford, UK,

Elsevier.

Eccles, J. S.; Wigfield, A. y Schiefele, U. (1998), “Motivation

to succeed”, en W. Damon y N. Eisenberg (edits.),

Handbook of child psychology, vol. 3, 5th ed., New

York, Wiley.

Influencia de las metas en el aprendizajeco-regulado con ambientes hipermedia

Elliot, A. y McGregor, H. (2001), “A 2 x 2 achievement

goal framework”, en Journal of Personality and Social

Psychology, 80(3), pp. 501-519.

Hagen, A.S. y Weinstein, C.E. (1995), “Achievement goals,

self-regulated learning, and the role of classroom

context”, en P. R. Pintrich (edit.), Understanding selfregulated

learning, San Francisco, Jossey-Bass Pub.

Harackiewicz, J. M. et al. (2002), “Predicting success in

college. A longitudinal study of achievement goal and

ability measures as predictors of interest and performance

from freshman year through graduation”, en

Journal of Educational Psychology, 94, pp. 562-575.

Jacobson, M. y Archodidou, A. (2000), “The design of hypermedia

tools for learning. Fostering conceptual change

and transfer of complex scientific knowledge”, en

Journal of the Learning Sciences, 9(2), pp. 145-199.

Järvelä, S. y Salovaara, H. (2004), “The interplay of motivational

goals and cognitive strategies in a new

pedagogical culture. A context-oriented and qualitative

approach”, en European Psychologist, 9(4),

pp. 232–244.

Jonassen, D. y Reeves, T. (1996), Learning with technology.

Using computers as cognitive tools, en Jonassen, D.

(edit.), Handbook of research for educational communications

and technology, New York, Macmillan.

Jones, M.; Estell, D. y Alexander, J. (2008), Friends, classmates,

and self-regulated learning. Discussions with peers

inside and outside the classroom. Metacognition and

Learning. Springer Science + Business Media.

Kandel, D. B. y Andrews, K. (1987), “Processes of adolescent

socialization by parents and peers”, en The International

Journal of the Addictions, 22, pp. 319–342.

Lajoie, P. (2000), Computers as cognitive tools. No more

walls, Vol. II., Mahwah, NJ, Lawrence Erlbaum.

Lajoie, S. P. y Azevedo, R. (2006), “Teaching and learning

in technology-rich environments”, en Alexander, P. y

Winne, P. (edits.), Handbook of Educational Psychology

(2nd ed.), NJ, Erlbaum.

Land, S. y Greene, B. (2000), “Project-based learning with

the World Wide Web: A qualitative study of resource

integration”, en Educational Technology Research y

Development, 48(3), pp. 61-78.

McCaslin, M. y Hickey, D. T. (2001), “Self-regulated

learning and academic achievement. A Vygotskian

view”, en Zimmerman, B. J. y Schunk, D. H. (edits.),

Self-regulated learning and academic achievement,

Mahwah, NJ, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Moos, D. C. y Azevedo, R. (2006), “The role of goal

structure in undergraduates’ use of self-regulatory

variables in two hypermedia learning tasks”, en

Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia,

(1), pp. 49–86.

Nicholls, J. G. y Miller, A. T. (1984), “Reasoning about the

ability of self and others. A developmental study”, en

Child Development, 55, 1990-1999.

Paris, S.G. y Byrnes, J.P. (1989), “The constructivist approach

to self-regulation and learning in the classroom”,

en Zimmerman, B. J. y Schunk, D. H. (edits.), Self-regulated

learning and academic achievement: Theory,

research, and practice, New York, Springer-Verlag.

Pintrich, P. R. et al. (1993), “Reliability and predictive

validity of the motivated strategies for learning questionnaire

(MSLQ)”, en Educational and Psychological

Measurement, 53, pp. 801–813.

Pintrich, P. R. et al. (1991), A manual for the use of the

Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire

(MSLQ). National Center for Research to Improve

Postsecondary Teaching and Learning, Ann Arbor,

University of Michigan.

Pintrich, P. (2000), “The role of goal orientation in selfregulated

learning”, en Boekaerts, M.; Pintrich, P. y

Zeidner, M. (edits.), Handbook of self-regulation, San

Diego, CA, Academic Press.

Pintrich, P. R. y De Groot E. (1990), “Motivational and

self-regulated learning components of classroom

academic performance”, en Journal of Educational

Psychology, 82(1), pp. 33-50.

Pintrich, P. R. (1995), “Understanding Self-Regulated

Learning”, en Pintrich, P. R. (edit.), New Directions

for teaching and learning, No 63, Understanding SelfRegulated

Learning, San Francisco, Jossey-Bass.

Reusser, K. (2001), “Co-constructivism in educational

theory and practice”, en Smelser, N. J.; Baltes, P. y

Weinert, F. E. (edits.), International encyclopedia of

the social and behavioral sciences, Oxford, UK, Pergamon/Elsevier

Science.

Roschelle, J. y Teasley, S. (1995), “The construction of shared

knowledge in collaborative problem solving”, en

O’Malley, C. (edit.), Computersupported collaborative

learning, Berlin, Springer.

Ryan, A. M. (2001), “The peer group as a context for

the development of young adolescents motivation

and achievement”, en Child Development, 72(4), pp.

–1150.

Descargas

Publicado

2010-12-01

Cómo citar

Leguizamón González, M. C., & López Vargas, O. (2010). Influencia de las metas en el aprendizaje co-regulado con ambientes hipermedia. Pedagogía Y Saberes, (32), 99.110. https://doi.org/10.17227/01212494.32pys99.110

Número

Sección

Investigaciones

Métricas PlumX