Efecto del feedback a través de screencasting en la escritura de un ensayo discursivo
Resumen
Este artículo de investigación tiene por objetivo general evaluar el impacto del feedback mediante screencasting en ensayos discursivos escritos. Las tres dimensiones evaluadas fueron: organización y estructura, cumplimiento de la tarea y dominio del idioma.
La muestra estuvo conformada por dieciocho estudiantes de séptimo grado de un colegio privado en Concepción, Chile.
El estudio siguió un diseño preexperimental; es decir, se aplicó un pretest y un postest a un grupo de participantes intacto (no aleatorizado). El instrumento utilizado en ambos tests correspondió a la sección de escritura del test internacional Trinity. Con respecto a la intervención, el grupo recibió un tratamiento de tres semanas, que consistió en la escritura individual de tres ensayos discursivos en modalidad en línea. El grupo recibió feedback mediante la herramienta screencast.
A partir de los resultados del pretest y del postest se observaron diferencias significativas en el ensayo discursivo en sus tres dimensiones: organización y estructura, cumplimiento de la tarea y dominio del idioma. Estos resultados confirman la hipótesis planteada en este estudio: la provisión de feedback mediante screencast tiene un impacto positivo en la escritura de un ensayo discursivo. Con respecto a los resultados del cuestionario, la mayoría de los estudiantes manifestó una percepción positiva hacia el feedback recibido mediante screencast.
Citas
Ali, A. (2016). Effectiveness of Using Screencast Feedback on efl Students’ Writing and Perception. English Language Teaching, 9(8), 106-121. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1106616.pdf DOI: https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v9n8p106
Bakla, A. (2018). An Overview of Screencast Feedback in efl Writing: Fad or the Future. Yabancı Dil Olarak Türkçe Öğretimi ve Yabancı Dil Öğretimi Araştırmaları, 319-331. http://replay.tlc.aston.ac.uk/wp-content/uploads/sites/40/2019/01/An-Overview-of-Screencast- Feedback-in-EFL-Writing-Fad-or-the-Future.pdf
Bakla, A. (2020). A Mixed-Methods Study of Feedback Modes in efl Writing. Language Learning and Technology, 24(1), 107-128. https://www.lltjournal.org/item/10125-44712/ DOI: https://doi.org/10.64152/10125/44712
Boone, J. y Carlson, S. (2011). Paper Review Revolution: Screencasting Feedback for Developmental Writers. nade Digest, 5(3), 15-23. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1097602.pdf
Burke, D. y Pieterick, J. (2010). Giving Students Effective Written Feedback. McGraw-Hill Education.
Cárcamo, B. (2020). Classifying Written Corrective Feedback for Research and Educational Purposes: A Typology Proposal. Profile Issues in Teachers’ Professional Development, 22(2), 211-222. http://www.scielo.org.co/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1657-07902020000200211 DOI: https://doi.org/10.15446/profile.v22n2.79924
Cheng, D. y Li, M. (2020). Screencast Video Feedback in Online tesol Classes. Computers and Composition, (58), 102612. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compcom.2020.102612 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compcom.2020.102612
Cranny, D. (2016). Screencasting: A Tool to Facilitate Engagement with Formative Feedback? aishe-j: The All Ireland Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 8(3), 2911-2927. https://doi.org/10.62707/aishej.v8i3.291
Cunningham, K. (2019). Student Perceptions and Use of Technology-Mediated Text and Screencast Feedback in esl Writing. Computers and Composition, (52), 222-241. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compcom.2019.02.003 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compcom.2019.02.003
Edwards, K., Dujardin, A. y Williams, N. (2012). Screencast Feedback for Essays on a Distance Learning ma in Professional Communication: An Action Research Project. Journal of Academic Writing, 2(1), 95-126. https://doi.org/10.18552/joaw.v2i1.62 DOI: https://doi.org/10.18552/joaw.v2i1.62
Ellis, R. (2009). Corrective Feedback and Teacher Development. L2 Journal, 1(1). https://doi.org/10.5070/l2.v1i1.9054 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5070/L2.V1I1.9054
Ebrahimi, S. y Ebadi, S. (2024). Exploring the Impact of Screencast-Based Ipsative Assessment on efl Students’ Writing Development. Language Testing in Asia, (14). https://languagetestingasia.springeropen.com/articles/10.1186/s40468-024-00315-y DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40468-024-00315-y
Ghosn-Chelala, M. y Al-Chibani, W. (2018). Screencasting: Supportive Feedback for efl Remedial Writing Students. International Journal of Information and Learning Technology, 35(3), 146-159. https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/ijilt-08-2017-0075/ full/html DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/IJILT-08-2017-0075
Gibbs, G. y Simpson, C. (2004). Does Your Assessment Support Your Students’ Learning? Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 1(1), 1-30. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/239768130_Does_Your_Assessment_Support_Your_Students’_Learning
Gould, J. y Day, P. (2013). Hearing You Loud and Clear: Student Perspectives of Audio Feedback in Higher Education. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 38(5), 554-566. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/02602938.2012.660131 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2012.660131
Hattie, J. y Timperley, H. (2007). The Power of Feedback. Review of Educational Research, 77(1), 81-112. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/ abs/10.3102/003465430298487 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3102/003465430298487
Henderson, M. y Phillips, M. (2015). Video-Based Feedback on Student Assessment: Scarily Personal. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 31(1). https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.1878 DOI: https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.1878
Hernández, R., Fernández, C. y Baptista, P. (2014). Metodología de la investigación (6.ª ed.). McGraw-Hill.
Hyland, K. y Hyland, F. (2019). Feedback in Second Language Writing: Contexts and Issues. Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108635547
Hynson, Y. (2012). An Innovative Alternative to Providing Writing Feedback on Students’ Essays. Teaching English with Technology, 12(1), 53-57. https://www.researchbank.ac.nz/items/3ff29373-d8e4-48ea-89f3-eda41085143b
Izumi, S. (2002). Output, Input Enhancement, and the Noticing Hypothesis: An Experimental Study on esl Relativization. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 24(4), 541-577. https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/studies-in-second-language-acquisition/article/ output-input-enhancement-and-the-noticing-hypothesis/6A24AE05CFBBB36D88AB84E8672A5C43 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263102004023
Jackson, M. y Bostic, T. (2013). Show and Tell: Student and Instructor Perceptions of Screencast Assessment. Assessing Writing, 18(4), 257-277. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2013.05.001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2013.08.001
Juffs, A. y Harrington, M. (2011). Aspects of Working Memory in L2 Learning. Language Teaching, 42(2), 137-166. https://doi.org/10.1017/ S0261444810000509 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444810000509
Kim, E. y Lee, K. (2019). Effects of an Examiner’s Positive and Negative Feedback on Self-Assessment of Skill Performance, Emotional Response, and Self-Efficacy in Korea: A Quasi-Experimental Study. bmc Medical Education, (19), 1-7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-019-1595-x
Knauf, H. (2016). Reading, Listening and Feeling: Audio Feedback as a Component of an Inclusive Learning Culture at Universities. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, (41), 442-449. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-019-1595-x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2015.1021664
Leibold, N. y Shwarz, L. (2015). The Art of Giving Online Feedback. Journal of Effective Teaching, 15(1), 34-46.
Li, W., Wang, F., Mayer, R. y Liu, T. (2022). Los agentes pedagógicos animados mejoran los resultados de aprendizaje y la actividad cerebral durante el aprendizaje. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, (38), 621637.
Marín, F. (2013). Análisis y diagnóstico de errores en estudiantes de inglés como lengua extranjera. Exedra: Revista Científica, (8), 182-198.
Masid, O. (2017). La metáfora lingüística en español como lengua extranjera (ele): Estudio preexperimental en tres niveles de competencia. Porta Linguarum, (27), 155-170. https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/articulo?codigo=6151256
Matsumura, A. y Hann, G. (2004). Computer Anxiety and Students’ Preferred Feedback Methods in efl Writing. The Modern Language Journal, 88(3), 403-415. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0026-7902.2004.00237.x
Mayer, R. (2022). Teoría cognitiva del aprendizaje multimedia. En R. Mayer y L. Fiorella (eds.), The Cambridge Handbook of Multimedia Learning (3.ª ed., pp. 57-72). Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108894333.008
Muñoz, C., Rojas, R. y Salazar, F. (2013). La enseñanza del inglés en Chile: enfoques predominantes y desafíos. Revista Electrónica Actualidades Investigativas en Educación, 13(2), 1-20.
Nassaji, H. (2016). Researching Corrective Feedback in Interaction and Instruction. Language Teaching Research, 20(4), 433-435. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168816651018 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168816651018
Orlando, J. (2016). A Comparison of Text, Voice, and Screencasting Feedback to Online Students. American Journal of Distance Education, 30(3), 156-166. https://doi.org/10.1080/08923647.2016.1187472 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/08923647.2016.1187472
Ormeño, A. y Panes, C. (2021). Enseñanza del inglés en contextos escolares chilenos: Desafíos para el desarrollo de la escritura. Revista Chilena de Educación en Lenguas Extranjeras, 12(1), 55-72. https://repositorio.uchile.cl/bitstream/handle/2250/168029/Ense%C3%B1anza%20 del%20ingl%C3%A9s%20en%20contextos%20vulnerables.pdf?sequence=1
Ormeño, A., Panes, C. y Vidal, M. (2021). Estrategias para la enseñanza de la escritura en inglés como lengua extranjera: un estudio explo¬ratorio en Chile. Lenguas Modernas, 58(2), 34-50.
Orsmond, P., Maw, S., Park, J., Gomez, S. y Crook, (2013). Moving Feedback Forward: Theory to Practice. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 38(2), 240-252. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2011.625472
Pachuashvili, N. (2024). Using Screencast Video Feedback in the 21st Century efl Writing Class. iafor Journal of Education, 12(1), 225-242. https://doi.org/10.22492/ije.12.1.0 DOI: https://doi.org/10.22492/ije.12.1.09
Price, M., Handley, K., Millar, J. y O’Donovan, B. (2010). Feedback: All That Effort, but What Is the Effect? Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 35(3), 277-289. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602930903541007 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02602930903541007
Robinson, P. (1995). Aptitude, Awareness, and the Fundamental Similarity of Implicit and Explicit Second Language Learning. En R. Schmidt (ed.), Attention and Awareness in Foreign Language Learning (pp. 303-357). University of Hawai’i Press.
Schachter, J. (1998). Recent Research in Language Learning Studies: Promises and Problems. Language Learning, 48(4), 557-583. https://eureka-mag.com/research/062/734/062734225.php?srsltid=AfmBOoqy_DPpDJ_Y6nX4sXfWspoDuTGEioXw53gCZ1NJMTMcaunVICr6 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/0023-8333.00059
Schmidt, R. (1990). The Role of Consciousness in Second Language Learning. Applied Linguistics, 11(2), 129-158. https://doi.org/10.1093/ applin/11.2.129 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/11.2.129
Seliem, S. y Ahmed, A. (2009). Missing: Electronic Feedback in Egyptian efl Essay Writing Classes. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ ED505841.pdf
Truscott, J. (1998). Instance Theory and Universal Grammar in Second Language Research. Second Language Research, 14(3), 257-291. https://doi.org/10.1191/026765898670205199 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1191/026765898670205199
Whitehurst, J. (2014). Screencast Feedback for Clear and Effective Revisions of High-Stakes Process Assignments. Conference on College Composition and Communication. http://www.ncte.org/cccc/owi-open-resource/screencast-feedback
Descargas
Derechos de autor 2025 Folios
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial 4.0.
