Educación en la era digital: revisión bibliométrica de los nativos digitales en dos décadas
Resumen
Los nativos digitales forman una generación que creció utilizando la tecnología como principal medio de comunicación. A pesar de la relevancia del tema, aún faltan estudios bibliométricos integrales que relacionen el concepto de nativos digitales con el contexto educativo. Este trabajo analiza la producción académica sobre nativos digitales en la educación entre 2001 y 2023, destacando tendencias recientes. Se utilizaron datos de la base Scopus y el programa VOSviewer para el análisis bibliométrico. Autores como Bennett, Antón-Sancho y Fernández-Arias se destacaron, y el artículo más citado fue “Nativos Digitales, Inmigrantes Digitales Parte 1” de Prensky (2001), referencia central en el área. La investigación identificó cinco líneas temáticas principales: educación computacional, redes sociales, era digital, formación educativa, tecnologías móviles y e-learning. Entre los términos más relevantes para futuras investigaciones están competencia digital, smartphone, aplicación, gamificación, tecnología educativa y era digital. El estudio se consolida como referencia en estudios bibliométricos sobre nativos digitales en el contexto educativo, lo que resalta la importancia de futuras investigaciones sobre tecnologías de enseñanza y el papel de las redes de citación y subtemas emergentes. Finalmente, destaca la necesidad de que las instituciones educativas adapten sus metodologías a la era digital, promoviendo prácticas innovadoras y alineadas con las demandas contemporáneas.
Citas
Alon, L., Sung, S., Cho, J., & Kizilcec, R. F. (2023). From emergency to sustainable online learning: Changes and disparities in undergraduate course grades and experiences in the context of COVID-19. Computers & Education, 203, 104870.
AlRyalat, S. A. S., Malkawi, L. W., & Momani, S. M. (2019). Comparing Bibliometric Analysis Using PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science Databases. Journal of Visualized Experiments: JoVE, 152. https://doi.org/10.3791/58494
Altinpulluk, H., & Yildirim, Y. (2023). The bibliometric analysis of the augmented reality research carried out with the experimental method published in scopus between 2012-2022. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 24(3), Artigo 3. https://doi.org/10.17718/tojde.1168110
Andrea, B., Gabriella, H.-C., & Tímea, J. (2016). Y and Z generations at workplaces. Journal of Competitiveness, 8(3), 90–106. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.7441/joc.2016.03.06
Arifah, M. N., Munir, M. A., & Nudin, B. (2021). Educational Design for Alpha Generation in the Industrial Age 4.0. 137–145. https://doi.org/10.2991/aebmr.k.210305.026
Aswathy, S., & Gopikuttan, A. (2015). Bibliometric observation of publication output of university teachers: A study with special reference to physics. Journal of Scientometric Research, 4(1). https://www.jscires.org/4/1
Babu, D. R., Goli, G., Rao, K. V. N., & Rao, N. S. (2023). Effectiveness in Online Professional Education: Influences of Technology, Lms, Personal Factors and Teaching Aids. Journal of Engineering Education Transformations, 36(3), 170–178. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.16920/jeet/2023/v36i3/23109
Bassiouni, D. H., & Hackley, C. (2014). “Generation Z” children’s adaptation to digital consumer culture: A critical literature review. Journal of Customer Behaviour, 13(2), 113–133. https://doi.org/10.1362/147539214X14024779483591
Beltrán-Flandoli, A. M., Pérez-Rodríguez, A., & Mateus, J.-C. (2023). YouTube as a Cyber-Classroom. Critical Review of its Pedagogical Use at Ibero-American University. RIED-Revista Iberoamericana de Educación a Distancia, 26(1), 287–306. https://doi.org/10.5944/ried.26.1.34372
Bennett, S., Maton, K., & Kervin, L. (2008). The ‘digital natives’ debate: A critical review of the evidence. British Journal of Educational Technology, 39(5), 775–786. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2007.00793.x
Berkup, S. B. (2014). Working with generations X and Y In generation Z period: Management of different generations in business life. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences, 5(19), 218–229. https://doi.org/10.5901/mjss.2014.v5n19p218
Bilir, S., Göğüş, E., Taş, Ö. Ö., & Yontan, T. (2015). A new ranking scheme for the institutional scientific performance. Journal of Scientometric Research, 4(2). https://www.jscires.org/article/113
Börner, K., Sanyal, S., & Vespignani, A. (2007). Network science. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 41(1), 537–607. https://doi.org/10.1002/aris.2007.1440410119
Bozkurt, A., Karakaya, K., Turk, M., Karakaya, Ö., & Castellanos-Reyes, D. (2022). The Impact of COVID-19 on Education: A Meta-Narrative Review. TechTrends, 66(5), 883–896. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-022-00759-0
Chen, C.-C., Wang, N.-C., Tang, K.-Y., & Tu, Y.-F. (2022). Research issues of the top 100 cited articles on information literacy in higher education published from 2011 to 2020: A systematic review and co-citation network analysis. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 38(6), Artigo 6. https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.7695
Churiyaha, M., Sholikhan, S., & Filianti, F. (2022). Mobile learning uses in vocational high school: A bibliometric analysis. World Journal on Educational Technology: Current Issues, 14(2), 484–497. https://doi.org/10.18844/wjet.v14i2.6990
Dastane, O., & Haba, H. F. (2023). The Landscape of Digital Natives Research: A Bibliometric and Science Mapping Analysis. FIIB Business Review, 23197145221137960. https://doi.org/10.1177/23197145221137960
De Gioannis, E., Ballarino, G., & Cartagini, D. (2023). Parents and teachers’ compensatory strategies during COVID-19 school closures: A scoping review. International Review of Education, 69(5), 603–623. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11159-023-10011-3
De Groote, S. L., & Raszewski, R. (2012). Coverage of Google Scholar, Scopus, and Web of Science: A case study of the h-index in nursing. Nursing Outlook, 60(6), 391–400. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.outlook.2012.04.007
Evans, C., & Robertson, W. (2020). The four phases of the digital natives debate. Human Behavior & Emerging Technology, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1002/hbe2.196
Fernández-Sánchez, M. R., González-Fernández, A., & Acevedo-Borrega, J. (2023). Conceptual Approach to the Pedagogy of Serious Games. Information, 14(2), Artigo 2. https://doi.org/10.3390/info14020132
Hebebci, M. T., & Nilay, O. (2023). Blended learning in higher education: a bibliometric analysis. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 24(3), 93–116.
Ilin, I., & Shestova, T. (2014). Z-Generation. In Value Inquiry Book Series (Vol. 276), (p. 500).
Jacso, P. (2005). As we may search—Comparison of major features of the Web of Science, Scopus, and Google Scholar citation-based and citation-enhanced databases. Current Science, 89(9), 1537–1547.
Jones, C., Ramanau, R., Cross, S., & Healing, G. (2010). Net generation or Digital Natives: Is there a distinct new generation entering university? Computers & Education, 54(3), 722–732. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2009.09.022
Kesharwani, A. (2020). Do (how) digital natives adopt a new technology differently than digital immigrants? A longitudinal study. Information & Management, 57(2), 103170. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2019.103170
Khurana, P., Ganesan, G., Kumar, G., & Sharma, K. (2022). A Comparative Analysis of Unified Informetrics with Scopus and Web of Science. Journal of Scientometric Research, 11(2), 146–154. https://doi.org/10.5530/jscires.11.2.16
Koksal, M. H. (2019). Differences among baby boomers, Generation X, millennials, and Generation Z wine consumers in Lebanon: Some perspectives. International Journal of Wine Business Research, 31(3), 456–472. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJWBR-09-2018-0047
Li, J., Burnham, J. F., Lemley, T., & Britton, R. M. (2010). Citation Analysis: Comparison of Web of Science®, ScopusTM, SciFinder®, and Google Scholar. Journal of Electronic Resources in Medical Libraries, 7(3), 196–217. https://doi.org/10.1080/15424065.2010.505518
Li, S. C., & Zhu, J. (2023). Cognitive-motivational engagement in ICT mediates the effect of ICT use on academic achievements: Evidence from 52 countries. Computers & Education, 204, 104871.
Liu, W., Huang, M., & Wang, H. (2021). Same journal but different numbers of published records indexed in Scopus and Web of Science Core Collection: Causes, consequences, and solutions. Scientometrics, 126(5), 4541–4550. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-021-03934-x
Mannhein, K. (1952). The Problem of Generations. Essays on the Sociology of Knowledge, 276–322.
Margaryan, A., Littlejohn, A., & Vojt, G. (2011). Are digital natives a myth or reality? University students’ use of digital technologies. Computers and Education, 56(2), 429–440. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2010.09.004
Mirakyan, A., & Berezka, S. (2022). Management and COVID-19: Digital Shift to Remote Work and Remote Management. In D. A. Alexandrov, A. V. Boukhanovsky, A. V. Chugunov, Y. Kabanov, O. Koltsova, I. Musabirov, & S. Pashakhin (Orgs.), Digital Transformation and Global Society (pp. 446–460). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-93715-7_32
Moreira, S. A. S. (2022). Favorite learning tools of the Generation Z enrolled in the Administration technical course of a Federal Institute: The context of the discipline of Logistics. Revista Brasileira de Estudos Pedagógicos, 103, 430–449.
Mospan, N. (2023). Trends in emergency higher education digital transformation during the COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of University Teaching and Learning Practice, 20(1), 50–70. https://doi.org/10.53761/1.20.01.04
Moya, S., & Camacho, M. (2021). Identifying the key success factors for the adoption of mobile learning. Education and Information Technologies, 26, 3917–3945.
Müller, W., & Leyer, M. (2023). Understanding intention and use of digital elements in higher education teaching. Education and Information Technologies, 28(12), 15571–15597. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-11798-2
Nguyen, H. L., Tran, K., Doan, P. L. N., & Nguyen, T. (2022). Demand for Mobile Health in Developing Countries During COVID-19: Vietnamese’s Perspectives from Different Age Groups and Health Conditions. Patient Preference and Adherence, 16, 265–284. https://doi.org/10.2147/PPA.S348790
Pedaste, M., Kallas, K., & Baucal, A. (2023). Digital competence test for learning in schools: Development of items and scales. Computers & Education, 104830.
Pérez-Escoda, A., Castro-Zubizarreta, A., & Fandos-Igado, M. (2016). Digital skills in the Z generation: Key questions for a curricular introduction in primary school. Comunicar, 24(49), 71–79. https://doi.org/10.3916/C49-2016-07
Prensky, M. (2001a). Digital Natives, Digital Immigrants Part 1. On the Horizon, 9(5), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1108/10748120110424816
Prensky, M. (2001b). Digital Natives, Digital Immigrants Part 2: Do They Really Think Differently? On the Horizon, 9(6), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1108/10748120110424843
Saltos-Rivas, R., Novoa-Hernández, P., & Rodríguez, R. S. (2023). Understanding university teachers’ digital competencies: A systematic mapping study. Education and Information Technologies, 28(12), 16771–16822. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-11669-w
Selwyn, N. (2009). The digital native—Myth and reality. Aslib Proceedings: New Information Perspectives, 61(4), 364–379. https://doi.org/10.1108/00012530910973776
Singh, S., Solkhe, A., & Gautam, P. (2022). What do we know about Employee Productivity?: Insights from Bibliometric Analysis. Journal of Scientometric Research, 11(2). https://doi.org/10.5530/jscires.11.2.20
Singh, V. K., Singh, P., Karmakar, M., Leta, J., & Mayr, P. (2021). The journal coverage of Web of Science, Scopus and Dimensions: A comparative analysis. Scientometrics, 126(6), 5113–5142. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-021-03948-5
Teo, T. (2013). An initial development and validation of a Digital Natives Assessment Scale (DNAS). Computers and Education, 67, 51–57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2013.02.012
Thelwall, M. (2018). Dimensions: A competitor to Scopus and the Web of Science? Journal of Informetrics, 12(2), 430–435. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2018.03.006
Tran, T., Ho, M.-T., Pham, T.-H., Nguyen, M.-H., Nguyen, K.-L. P., Vuong, T.-T., Nguyen, T.-H. T., Nguyen, T.-D., Nguyen, T.-L., Khuc, Q., La, V.-P., & Vuong, Q.-H. (2020). How Digital Natives Learn and Thrive in the Digital Age: Evidence from an Emerging Economy. Sustainability, 12, 3819. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12093819
Tzafilkou, K., Perifanou, M., & Economides, A. A. (2023). Assessing teachers’ digital competence in primary and secondary education: Applying a new instrument to integrate pedagogical and professional elements for digital education. Education and Information Technologies, 28(12), 16017–16040. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-11848-9
van Eck, N. J., & Waltman, L. (2010). Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping. Scientometrics, 84(2), 523–538. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-009-0146-3
Zanjirchi, S. M., Jalilian, N., & Shahmohamadi Mehrjardi, M. (2019). Open innovation: From technology exploitation to creation of superior performance. Asia Pacific Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, 13(3), 326–340. https://doi.org/10.1108/APJIE-02-2019-0005
Zheltukhina, M. R., Kislitsyna, N. N., Panov, E. G., Atabekova, A., Shoustikova, T., & Kryukova, N. I. (2023). Language learning and technology: A conceptual analysis of the role assigned to technology. Online Journal of Communication and Media Technologies, 13(1), e202303.
Descargas
Derechos de autor 2026 Tecné, Episteme y Didaxis: TED
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial 4.0.
