Let’s Kill the Bug: the School Garden as an Educational Scenario for Argumentation and Decision Making

  • Gerardo Juan Guerrero Centro de Investigaciones y de Estudios Avanzados del IPN (Cinvestav), Unidad de Monterrey
  • Gonzalo Peñaloza Centro de Investigaciones y de Estudios Avanzados del IPN (Cinvestav), Unidad de Monterrey
Keywords: argumentation, environmental education, teaching, didactics, basic education

Abstract

The school garden has been a widely used strategy as a teaching resource for the teaching of biology and for environmental education. This research article explores the possibilities of this educational scenario to raise ethical and environmental dilemmas in which interests and benefits are related, and that involve decisions about the life and death of an organism. For this, an investigation was carried out with students in the third (N = 21) and sixth (N = 42) grades of basic education, who were involved in the cultivation of an orchard and in discussions about dilemmas around conservation or eradication of an insect in the garden. Through the justifications of their decisions, the possibilities of this scenario for the development of argumentative and decision-making skills are evidenced. The findings suggest that students privilege the emotional domain over the cognitive in their justifications, that is, that students do not frequently include biological concepts in the reasons that are part of their arguments.

References

Abd-El-Khalick, F. (2003). Socioscientific Issues in Pre-college Science Classrooms. En D. Zeidler (ed.). The Role of Moral Reasoning and Discourse on Socioscientific Issues in Science Education (pp. 41-62). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.

Balgopal, M. y Wallace, A. (2009). Decisions and Dilemmas: Using Writing to Learn Activities to Increase Ecological Literacy. Journal of Environmental Education, 40(3), 13-26. doi:10.3200/joee.40.3.13-26. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3200/JOEE.40.3.13-26

Betancur, L. (2009). El desarrollo de la competencia argumentativa. Textos. Didáctica de la Lengua y de la Literatura, 29, 22-26.

Collado, S., Evans, G., Corraliza, J. y Sorrel, M. A. (2015). The Role Played by Age on Children’s Pro-ecological Behaviors: An Exploratory Analysis. J. Environ. Psychol, 44, 85-94. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2015.09.006

Conrado, D. Nunez-Neto, N. y El-Hani, C. (2015). Argumentação sobre problemas socioambientais no ensino de biologia. Educacao em Revista, 31(1), 329-357. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/0102-4698125846

Evagorou, M. (2011). Discussing a Socioscientific Issue in a Primary School Classroom: The Case of Using a Technology-Supported Environment in Formal and Nonformal Settings. En T. Sadler (ed.), Socio-scientific Issues in the Classroom (pp. 133-160). Londres: Springer.

Evagorou, M., Jiménez-Aleixandre, M. P. y Osborne, J. (2012). ‘Should We Kill the Grey Squirrels?’ A Study Exploring Students’ Justifications and Decision-making. International Journal of Science Education, 34(3), 401-428. doi:10.1080/09500693.2011.619211 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2011.619211

Grace, M., y Ratcliffe, M. (2002). The Science and Values Young People Draw Upon to Make Decisions About Biological Conservation Issues. International Journal of Science Education, 24, 1157-1169. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690210134848

Jiménez-Aleixandre, M. P. y Pereiro-Munoz, C. (2002). Knowledge Producers or Knowledge Consumers?Argumentation and Decision Making About Environmental Management. International Journal of Science Education, 24(11), 1171-1190. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690210134857

Jiménez-Aleixandre, M.P. (2014). Determinism and Underdetermination in Genetics: Implications for Students’ Engagement in Argumentation and Epistemic Practices. Science & Education, 23(2), 465-484 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-012-9561-6

King, D. y Ritchie, S. (2012). Learning Science Through Real-World Contexts. En B. Fraser, K. Tobin y C. McRobbie. (eds.). Second International Handbook of Science Education (pp. 69-79). Dordrecht: Springer.

Koch, S., Barkmann, J., Sundawati, L. y Bögeholz, S. (2013). Subjective Theories of Indonesian Agronomy and Biology Teacher Students on Environmental Commons Dilemmas. International Research in Geographical and Environmental Education, 22(2), 120-138. doi: 10.1080/10382046.2013.779123 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10382046.2013.779123

Kortland, K. (1997). Garbage: Dumping, Burning and Reusing/Recycling: Students’ Perception of the Waste Issue. International Journal of Science Education, 19, 65-77. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/0950069970190105

Leddon, E. M., Waxman, S. R. y Medin, D. L. (2009). Unmasking “alive”: Children’s Appreciation of a Concept Linking all Living Things. J. Cogn. Dev., 9, 461-473. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/15248370802678463

Liem, A. (2005). Promoting Science Literacy by Engaging the Public. PLoS Biol, 3(12), e427. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.0030427

López, M., Álvarez, P., González, E. y García, M. (2014). Medidas del comportamiento ecológico y antecedentes: conceptualización y validación empírica de escalas. Universitas Psychologica, 14(1), 189-204. https://doi.org/10.11144/Javeriana.upsy14-1.mcea DOI: https://doi.org/10.11144/Javeriana.upsy14-1.mcea

Menzel, S. y Bogeholz, S. (2009). The Loss of Biodiversity as a Challenge for Sustainable Development: How do Pupils in Chile and Germany Perceive Resource Dilemmas? Research in Science Education, 39(4), 429-447. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-008-9087-8

Pol, E. y Castrechini, A. (2013). ¿Disrupción en la educación para la sostenibilidad? Revista Latinoamericana de Psicología, 45(3), 335-349. http://dx.doi.org/10.14349/rlp.v45i3.1477 DOI: https://doi.org/10.14349/rlp.v45i3.1477

Relva, M. y Sanguinetti, J. (2016). Ecología, impacto y manejo del ciervo colorado (Cervus elaphus) en el noreste de la Patagonia Argentina. Mastozoología Neotropical, 23(2), 221-238.

Sadler, T. (2009). Socioscientific Issues in Science Education: Labels, Reasoning and Transfer. Cultural Studies in Science Education, 4(3), 705-711. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11422-008-9133-x

Sousa, D. A. (2001). How the brain learns. Thousand Oaks, USA: Sage.

Stevenson, H. (2018). Global Environmental Politics Problems, Policy and Practice. United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press.

Toulmin, S. (1958). The Uses of Argument. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Stone, M. K. y Barlow, Z. (2005). Ecological Literacy: Educating Our Children For a Sustainable World. San Francisco: Sierra Club Books.

Van Weelie, D. (2002). Making Biodiversity Meaningful Through Environmental Education. International DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690210134839

Journal of Science Education, 24, 1143-1156.

Villanueva, S., Villaroel J. y Antón, A. (2018). Environmental Awareness and Its Relationship with the

Concept of the Living Being: A Longitudinal Study. Sustainability, 10, 1-10. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10072358 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su10072358

Villaroel, J. D., Antón, Á., Zuazagoitia, D. y Nuño, T. (2017). Young Children’s Environmental Judgement and Its Relationship with their Understanding of the Concept of Living Things. Environ. Socio-Econ. Stud., 5, 1-10. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/environ-2017-0001

Wholrapp, H. (2014). The concept of argument. Dordrecht: Springer. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-8762-8

How to Cite
Guerrero, G. J., & Peñaloza, G. (2020). Let’s Kill the Bug: the School Garden as an Educational Scenario for Argumentation and Decision Making. Bio-grafía, 12(22). https://doi.org/10.17227/bio-grafia.vol.11.num22-9309

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
Published
2020-04-13
Section
Bioartículo-investigación

Métricas PlumX