As componentes do desenvolvimento profissional do formador de formadores na área de ciências naturais
Abstract
We share the first results of a research that revolves around trainers of trainers (FF) in the area of natural sciences, particularly on their Professional Development (PD), whose ultimate goal is to characterize the PD of FF. For this, it is necessary to identify both theoretically and empirically which are the components of that PD, which is the objective of this work. Initially we carried out a documentary investigation -first moment-, where the criteria that guided the search were: professional development, teacher learning, teacher growth and teacher change. Through content analysis and relying on Park and Oliver's Hexagon of Didactic Content Knowledge (2008), we represented the components of Teacher Professional Development (PPD) in a geometric figure, which was validated by experts. During the second moment, live research or field work, the intervention was carried out with the college of natural science teachers of the Benemérita Escuela Nacional de Maestros in Mexico City and various instruments were used. Finally, the findings obtained from the literature review, field work and expert judging allowed us to reconceptualize the DPP components and their representation through a new geometric figure: the DPP Sphere. Which is made up of three dimensions or scenarios: the classroom, the school and outside the school. And eight domains: personal, social, emotional, teacher identity, professional, knowledge, contextual and digital technologies.
References
Bell, B., & Gilbert, J. (1996). Teacher development: A model from science education. London: Routledge Falmer.
DOF - Diario Oficial de la Federación. (1984). Retrieved 10 March 2021, from http://www.dof.gob.mx/nota_detalle.php?codigo=4660109&fecha=23/03/1984
Ernest, P. (1995). The one and the many. In L.P. Stefe & J. Gale (Eds.), Constructivism in Education (pp. 459-586). NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Furio, C., & Carnicer, J. (2002). El desarrollo profesional del profesor de ciencias mediante tutorías de grupos cooperativos. Estudios de ocho casos. Enseñanza de las Ciencias, 20 (1), 47-73.
García, M. A. (2009). Aportes de la historia de la ciencia al desarrollo profesional de profesores de química [Tesis de Doctorado]. Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona.
Gil, A. (2002). Como elaborar projetos de pesquisa (4a ed.). São Paulo: Editora Atlas.
Guevara, R. (2016). El estado del arte en la investigación: ¿análisis de los conocimientos acumulados o indagación por nuevos sentidos? Revista Folios, 165-179.
Kitchenham, B. (2007). Guidelines for performing systematic literature reviews in software engineering (versión 2.3). UK: Keele University and University of Durham.
Lederman, N., Zeidler, D., & Lederman, J. (Eds.) (2023). Handbook of Research on Science Education (Vol. II). New York: Taylor & Francis.
Martínez-Rizo, F. R. (2019). El nuevo oficio del investigador educativo. Una introducción metodológica (1ª ed.). Universidad Autónoma de Aguascalientes.
Martínez Hernández, M. L., & Rodríguez Pineda, D. P. (2015). La formación profesional de los profesores de secundaria que enseñan Biología en México: el caso del Distrito Federal. Bio-Grafía. Escritos sobre la Biología y su enseñanza, Número Extraordinario, 970-981.
Oikión, G. (2008). Antecedentes históricos de la educación normal en México. En autor, El proceso curricular normalista del 84: un acercamiento desde la perspectiva de sus autores (pp. 29-68). México: Universidad Pedagógica Nacional.
Park, S., & Oliver, J. (2008). Revisiting the Conceptualisation of Pedagogical Content Knowledge (PCK): PCK as a Conceptual Tool to Understand Teachers as Professionals. Research in Science Education, 38(3), 261-284.
Perales, F. J., & Cañal, P. (2000). Didáctica de las ciencias experimentales: teoría y práctica de la enseñanza de las ciencias. En autores, La formación del profesorado en ejercicio (pp. 557-573).España: Editorial Marfil.
Simon, S., & Campbell, S. (2012). Teacher Learning and Professional Development in Science Education. In B. Fraser y K. Tobin, Second International Handbook of Science Education (pp. 307-320). London: Springer.
Downloads
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
